Just to the right side is another smaller box, which houses the only accessory included with the GTX 660 DirectCU II, a DVI to VGA adapter. Inside we find a folded cardboard insert with a clear plastic wrap securing the card to its environment. Inside the outer box is an elegant looking black box with a gold ASUS logo on the top. The box sides are designated for additional branding and mentioning of the DirectCU II cooler. The back of the box is where ASUS goes into much greater detail about the features. They are still using the “claw marks” design on the front, along with some information on the cooler. Not much has changed with the graphics applied to the box of ASUS DirectCU II video cards. In case you are wondering, yes this card supports SLI. The next set of features are more related to NVIDIA cards in general. On-board memory for the best gaming experience & the best resolutionįull support for Microsoft’s latest operating system, Windows 8 (x32 and 圆4). Automatically check and update drivers and BIOS versions.Monitoring widget provides real-time and detailed multi-parameter info.Detailed specs and actual card status with GPU-Z.They don’t.ĭirectCU thermal design utilizes direct contact copper heatpipes so heat is dissipated efficiently, delivering a 20% cooler and vastly quieter performance than reference.Īcclaimed DIGI+ VRM has been applied via a power design that uses digital voltage regulators to minimize power noise by 30% and enhance power efficiency by 15%, widen the voltage modulation range, and improve overall stability and longevity by 2.5 times longer than reference. I hardly think anything related to memory can be called exclusive, unless ASUS is making their own GDDR5. I’m good with all that, except for the 2 Gb memory claim. The first set of features are described as “ASUS Exclusive Features”. We’ll dive deeper into the features as the review progresses, but here are the major ones listed on the ASUS website. Much of what we see above can be verified using GPU-Z.Īs I mentioned earlier, even though this card is not factory overclocked like the TOP versions, it still boasts many of the same features. Up to 150W (1 additional 6 pin PCIe power required) ASUS GTX 660 DirectCU II SpecificationsĭVI Output : Yes x 1 (DVI-I), Yes x 1 (DVI-D) Here are the specifications as provided by ASUS. So, let’s run this card through its paces and find out if we have another worthy addition to the ASUS family of graphics cards! Specifications and Features While today’s sample might not be factory overclocked, it does still offer the same DirectCU II cooler and the same DIGI+VRM/Super Alloy Power designs. Today’s review will be on the non TOP version, which carries a part number of GTX660-DC2-2GD5. Three of them are their “TOP” factory overclocked versions, and the fourth is based on NVIDIA’s reference GPU core speed of 980 MHz (1033 MHz Boost Clock). AMD’s last-minute BIOS tweaks mean that the Radeon HD 7950 is in close contention, but in the mid-range battleground, the GTX 660 Ti just edges ahead as the new champion.At last check, ASUS has four GTX 660 video card offerings to choose from. Nvidia’s GTX 660 Ti is faster, available for comparable prices and runs more quietly, too. The GTX 660 Ti betters the HD 7950 convincingly in Just Cause 2 and DiRT 3, and is a little faster in Crysis it wasn’t until we fired up Crysis 2 that the Radeon HD 7950 managed to turn the tables. Performance is very close, although we’d say the Nvidia card nudges ahead here, too. Prices will vary depending on the overclock and other features included, but that bodes well for competing with the Radeon HD 7950, with AMD chips costing anywhere between £250 and £300. Our Asus model costs £281 inc VAT, and similar cards from Zotac and MSI will cost £260 inc VAT and £250 inc VAT. The final piece of the puzzle is value for money, and in this regard the GTX 660 Ti remains competitive. A peak temperature of 74˚C is nothing to worry about, and it’s exceptionally quiet, which is a far cry from the whirr emitted from our AMD sample when it ran more demanding benchmarks. Under load, it pulled 251W from the mains, which is only 5W more than AMD’s HD 7950. The GTX 660 Ti’s performance is married with impressive efficiency. The gap was just as wide across three monitors, with the GTX 660 Ti card scoring 47fps and the Radeon bringing up the rear with 39fps. At 1,920 x 1,080 and with Ultra settings, its 114fps result trounced the 87fps of the Radeon, and it continued the rout at 2,560 x 1,440, where it scored 73fps compared to the HD 7950’s 61fps. Our final gaming test, DiRT 3, saw the GTX 660 Ti card take the lead.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |